State Earthquake Forecasting Scientific Analysis

nnI already have part 1(Activity #20) done, and I have attached the activity #20 right below for you to get a sense of how it done. Now I only need you to help me answer part 2 in just 150 words.nnInstructions:n- Students will now present their knowledge on distinguishing between (1) pseudoscience, as described in their example in Activity #20, and (2) the scientific analysis of earthquake forecasting that has been implemented following the Parkfield Experiment conducted by the U.S. Geological Survey Experiment.nn- The analysis should be well-written and organized, clear.nnnnSome Advice for Technical Writing from professorn

n
• Be precise, accurate and concise — do not waste any words or phrases — keep on target

n

• Do not use the word “fact” or “truth” when discussing scientific results, instead place your focus on the verifiable evidence acquired through valid measurements and experiments.

n

• Avoid using “believe” – instead use “follow or be consistent with the scientific evidence”

n

n