Question DescriptionnnAssignment Objectives:nnto become familiar with scholarship in a particular area of bioethics.nnto demonstrate an ability to summarize another thinker’s argument or point of view.nnto demonstrate an ability to communicate effectively.nn Assignment Description: n The oral report is an article review. Students choose a current scholarly article written on a topic in bioethics to summarize and analyze. They present their summary and analysis in a 2-3 page essay and as an oral report via power point, Prezi, or some other presentation tool. Students use Stritch library data bases or bioethics anthologies of articles on reserve for this class to choose and then summarize a scholarly, academic articlethat entertains a topic in bioethics. Students then present their summary of the chosen article to the class along with an analysis of the article. A power point or prezi or handout is required. The report should include:n The article title and bibliographical information – author, where and when it was published. (A copy or link to the article should be submitted on Canvas.)nnA brief statement of the author’s credentials/affiliation, if accessible.nnA correct and detailed summary of the article’s argument, position, content.nnAn analysis which may include: a consideration of the truth or falsity of one or more statements made in the article; a consideration of weak or strong portions of the article; if an analogy is introduced, a consideration of whether the analogy ‘works’; an identification of any logical fallacies (Links to an external site.) that may be present; a statement about which theoretical perspective (if discernible) informs the author’s view.nnGrading will be based upon the quality of both written and oral presentations of the material. nnRubricnnOral Report Rubric (1) (1) (1) (1)nnOral Report Rubric (1) (1) (1) (1)nnCriteriaRatingsPtsnnThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent: Depth and Accuracynn45.0 ptsnnThe article was summarized in detail and with care. There were no inaccurate statements.nn35.0 ptsnn The article was summarized adequately. There were no inaccurate statements.n 30.0 ptsn The article was summarized in a basic way. There were some inaccurate statements.n 20.0 ptsnnThe article was summarized poorly. There were many inaccurate statements. It was incomplete.nn45.0 ptsFILLER TEXTnnThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis