Summarize what both sides of this legal argument are contending; concerning the judge or court ruling, which side did he favor and why?

Question DescriptionnnPick ONE OBJECTIVE journalist case. ( PLACES TO RESEARCH EX: U.S Supreme Court, Ny times) DO NO USE EDITORIALS.nnAnswer the following:nn- What civil liberties issue is raised in the article? ( put it on question form)nn-What constitutional passage are relevant to discussion? ( use the bill right/ Amendments to identify)nn- List the relevant words in the relevant amendment (s) related to the article.nn- Summarize what both sides of this legal argument are contending; concerning the judge or court ruling, which side did he favor and why?nn- Identify the source of the article using the following form: Author, Article title, source of the article, date of publication.nn-Use and article from 2009-2018nn*********HOW TO KNOW IF IN THE RIGH TRACK:nn* IS WHAT YOU HAVE AN ARTICLE PUBLISHED BY SOME JOURNALIST ORGANIZATION.nn*DOES THE ARTICLE RELATE TO CIVIL LIBERTIES AND ALSO CONCERN A CONSTITUTIONAL CONTROVERSY RELATED TO THE US CONSTITUTION.nn* DOES YOUR ARTICLE CONTAIN AN ACTION BY A JUDGE/COURT RELATED TO INTERPRETATION OF SOME PREVISIONS OF THE US BILLS OF RIGHTS (AMENDMENT 1-9)nn****PLEASE NOTE: