There is no guarantee for success for any person in a leadership role.

2 pages due April 7 ***** Part 1 – Discussion Path-Goal and Situational Theories of Leadership There is no guarantee for success for any person in a leadership role. It is not uncommon for a leader who has met success in one leadership role and environment to encounter an experience where his or her leadership becomes ineffective. As a result of various factors within situations, success may not be tied to the style of the leader. Various factors might include the situational context in which leadership is applied or the level of member motivation. For example, in Situational Theory, a leader may be effective because his or her style of leadership fits the situation. A leader may also be effective because of his or her ability to motivate subordinates. As outlined in Path-Goal Theory, a leader removes obstacles and provides support to subordinates to achieve goals. For this Discussion, review the Learning Resources to consider the strengths and limitations of using the Path-Goal Theory of leadership in health care administration situations. Path-Goal Theory is widely debated in terms of its validity in leadership practices. As a result, for this Discussion, you must determine if you think Path-Goal is a valid theory of leadership. Then, think about how Path-Goal Theory compares to the Situational Approach Theory of leadership and consider an example of this comparison. *** Part 1 – Write a 1 page paper that is 1. A brief description of two strengths and two limitations of Path-Goal Theory as applied in the field of health care administration. T 2. compare Path-Goal Theory to the Situational Approach Theory of leadership. Be specific. 3. Explain whether Path-Goal Theory is a valid theory of leadership. Justify your response. ***** Part 2 Professional Leadership Journal: Narcissism Assessment This week’s self-assessment, located in your course text (Assessment4_6.pdf), includes one brief individual leadership assessment entitled “Narcissism.” For this Personal Leadership Journal, complete the “Narcissism” assessment. As a scholar-practitioner of health care administration leadership, what might the assessment reveal about your perspective on the topic of Narcissism? Consider how Narcissism may impact your role in the field of health care administration. **** The Assignment 1 page paper that – use the completed assessment named Assessment4_6.pdf attached below to: • Explain new insights gained based on your results of the “Narcissism” assessment. • Explain how these new insights might impact your current or future role as a health care administration leader. Resources: CARTON, A. M., MURPHY, C., & CLARK, J. R. (2014). A (BLURRY) VISION OF THE FUTURE: HOW LEADER RHETORIC ABOUT ULTIMATE GOALS INFLUENCES PERFORMANCE. Academy Of Management Journal, 57(6), 1544-1570. doi:10.5465/amj.2012.0101 House, R. J. (1971). A Path Goal Theory of Leader Effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 16(3), 321-339. Luna, B.; Jolly, J., & Canadian Center of Science and Education. (2008). An Analysis of the Nuances and Practical Applications of Situational Leadership in the Management and Administration of International Health Care Organizations. International Journal of Business Management, 3(5), 18-25. Sarin, S., & O’Connor, G. C. (2009). First among Equals: The Effect of Team Leader Characteristics on the Internal Dynamics of Cross-Functional Product Development Teams. Journal Of Product Innovation Management, 26(2), 188-205. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5885.2009.00345.x