This assignment explores the issue of how corporate rights and responsibilities differ from those belonging to natural persons. 1. Read the article entitled: ‘Essential Speech: Why Corporate Speech is Not Free’ by Daniel J.H. Greenwood (1998) 83 Iowa L Rev. 995 found in Yalden, Sarra, Paton, Gillen, Davis, Condon Business Organizations: Principles, Policies, and Practice, (Emond Montgomery 2007) at page 239. 2. Then, read the case of Canadian Egg Marketing Agency v. Richardson [1993] 3 SCR 157 (excerpt in Yalden et al, Business Organizations: Principles, Policies, and Practice at page 246). 3. Then, read the case of Ford v. Quebec (Attorney-General) [1988] 2 SCR 712 (excerpt in Yalden et al, Business Organizations: Principles, Policies, and Practice at page 241-245). The, answer the following questions: 1. How do the above authorities define a ‘person’ compared to an ‘individual’ compared to a ‘corporation’? 2. How does the Supreme Court of Canada deal with property and economic rights of freedom of commercial expression especially when compared to the American treatment of commercial expression? 3. Are corporations’ rights in Canada fewer compared to citizens’ and individuals’ (natural persons’) rights and, if so, describe the differences. Post your answers in the submission box below. Make sure you provide references to the cases or the article that supports your answers.